❌

Reading view

(Reading through the explanations on why Echofeed is being shut down, I fee…

(Reading through the explanations on why Echofeed is being shut down, I feel the painful technical part of it more and more and I'm kind of sad there wasn't a chance to provide more help to still sort of keep that running. But I am also left wondering whether this is sort of a watershed moment of learning that this POSSE approach often proposed by the IndieWeb crowd actually just works in a very limited DYIish content for people who are able to handle that on their very own within their very own small scale with handcrafted solutions - which excludes everyone not really able of doing so at all. And it makes me wonder whether, ultimately, the idea proposed by ATProto - keep all your data in one single repository and available, visible to multiple different applications catering to different needs - might generally be smarter than having to copy data all around the 'net dozens and dozens of times.)

  •  

Interesting to notice that, even though things like that usually make it ar…

Interesting to notice that, even though things like that usually make it around here, the Digital Cleanup Day went by almost unnoticed by the different timelines I'm living in. Which is sad, because that's something that more than just a bit should be taken into consideration I guess. As in: Reducing energy consumption. Making machines last longer and perform better. Reducing network bandwidth consumed. Reducing personal time of life to be spent on digital tools and platforms. This seems a good thing to notice and keep in mind from an end-users perspective, as in "be aware of what tools you use, and try to minimize these as much as somewhat possible". But it also ... seems an interesting thing to consider for developers of software and operators of services. As in: How to ensure whatever "we" offer can be used by people under these circumstances? How to make sure our tools minimize energy consumption or resource demands on their end? How to make sure the tools we offer limit resource needs globally? How to make sure the tools we provide help people doing whatever they need or want to do without adding unneccessary clutter or complexity to their lives? There's still room for improvement, here and there.

https://www.digitalcleanupday.org/ 

#digital_technologies #linkdump #minimalism #sustainability

  •  

Morning listenings, on the bike: https://vivaldi.com/blog/6-stephanie-stima…

Morning listenings, on the bike:

https://vivaldi.com/blog/6-stephanie-stimac-igalia-for-a-better-web/

We also talk about the development of browser engines and the challenges of funding open-source projects. Whether you’re a developer or just curious about how the web evolves, this conversation offers a glimpse behind the scenes of browser development.

Halfway through it now, interesting to learn about Igalia and what they do, but more again and again stumbling across that huge elephant in the corner, that elephant of browsers and subsequently our access to most of nowadays "internet" for most people ist essentially funded by corporations. Period. And choosing a non-Mozilla fork of Firefox or a non-Google browser shell based on Chromium isn't changing anything about that. Even worse, it seems that this way we ought to be better supporting these companies because, at the very end, they fund what's needed for a lot of Free and Open Source implementations to even exist (not even talking about them employing a lot of developers and allowing them to be able to work on Free or Open Source code either full time or at least in their spare time). Imagining sustainable organic farmers doing this kind of ethical work in their spare time while being employed by some shady agricultural corporation that does pay their bills and earns them a living? That sounds ... more than just a bit difficult. It sounds like Free and Open Source software has a dire self-sustainability issue. But maybe that's only me.

  •